X
Advanced Search
Search

Shout It

Women Against Polygamy

Women Against Polygamy

50 wives shouldn't get you a university

by susana (Thu Feb 04, 2010)
You May Also Like

OK, enough with the book club bashing. Let's face it, the whole idea of a book club is an excuse for overworked housewives to meet at a fellow book clubber's home to drink free alcohol and discuss a book they may or may not have even read.

Sounds fantastic to me. Unlimited wine, interesting conversation, and a man free zone - where do I register? Seriously though, I am part of a 10-year, maybe longer, book club that is all women but not all overworked housewives. Some are underworked and some haven't even ever been married. We are a diverse bunch and I've read books I never would have even known about. For instance, we had a huge debate last week over ‘The 19th Wife' by David Ebershoff about polygamy in America.

Amazing to learn how a man named Brigham Young, the seminal Mormon leader of the mid 19thcentury, could have had over 50 wives and still to this day have a well respected American University (Brigham Young University) named after him. (If you don't want to read the whole book, February's ‘National Geographic' cover story, titled ‘Polygamy in America,' might pique your interest).

How is it common knowledge that polygamous societies are thriving in Arizona, Colorado and other western States but we can't do anything to stop it? Remember the raid and arrests on the polygamist sect in Texas 2 years ago? That raid led to the American people voicing their opposition to mothers and children being separated as authorities intervened. If I feel the children of polygamists are being raised in an unjust society do I have a right to order their guardians to change? Are my tax dollars contributing to the success of this society? How else are they surviving? Where do personal freedoms end and the rights of taxpayers begin? Does HBO contribute to the acceptance of this practice with its series ‘Big Love?'

Maybe we can all say ‘none of my business,' but for one minute picture yourself not knowing any different lifestyle and being wedded off at 17 to your 60-year-old stepfather and then someday having to listen to your partner have sex with a ‘sister wife,' or the lady behind door number 3. If we are in any way proponents of women's rights why do we just accept this?

Classic View
|
Expand All
Show:
Oldest First
|
Newest First
|
Most Popular First
Cancel

Please login before commenting and you'll be able to manage your comments.

Preview Submit
Posted Tue Feb 9, 2010 at 4:52 pm Reply Delete
Pat is right--it IS child abuse when girls are raised as subordinate, uneducated and, in some cases, raped. These people do not get marriage licenses for "unions" after the first marriage, and, I'm sorry to say, many of the "wives" are drawing welfare as "unwed mothers." It's hypocritical; it's very unfair to women (brain-washed as they might be) and it's a burden to society. And it's all in the name of their religion. How very Jesus-like!Report Abuse
Pat K
Posted Fri Feb 5, 2010 at 3:18 am Reply Delete
The first amendment has never protected religious practices that are in violation of the law. It only protects your right to believe what you want, not practice. We cannot offer human sacrifices in the name of religion for example. Polygamy is not a joke as set forth in Big Love. Thousands of children receive close to NO fathering and many of these girls know no other choice. It is child and female abuse.Report Abuse
Posted Thu Feb 4, 2010 at 2:49 pm Reply Delete
SOrry. Yes it's illegal in the States so they don't have legitimate marriage certificates but are recognised as married in their faith. Technically they're not breaking the law, howver some of the girls are married off when they are still minors (which is statutory rape) and they don't have a say in it. And when you get someone as powerful as Warren Thingy, they get away with that and far worse. The problem with many of these communities is that all the local authorities and law enforcement people are either part of it or turn a blind eye to it.Report Abuse
2 replies, Last reply by Toni on Thu Feb 4, 2010 at 11:03 pm
Liz
Posted Thu Feb 4, 2010 at 9:22 pm Reply Delete
@Toni : Since they are not recognized as married the law considers these women single mothers with no income. They are eligible for government assistance programs and welfare. As such, our tax dollars are supporting polygamy.Report Abuse
Posted Thu Feb 4, 2010 at 11:03 pm Reply Delete
@Noname: Oh marvellous. Yes, that makes sense. I hope that's not federal (ie. my) dollars.Report Abuse
Posted Thu Feb 4, 2010 at 3:27 pm Reply Delete
Polygamy is illegal in the US. The Texas raid was done out of concern for the statutory rape of minors. If a crime is being commited against children then regardless of religion we have to intervene. On the other hand the first ammendment upholds the right to religios freedom. Polygamy is not a new practice, it's been around for centuries (didn't Solomon have like 700 wives?), it just happens to be socially unacceptable in the US. I kind of like the idea of Polyandry where the woman has many husbands, the husbands do all the work, and if one is bad in bed, well, there's always the next guy.Report Abuse
Posted Thu Feb 4, 2010 at 10:49 am Reply Delete
My understanding is polygamy is actually illegal in the US (like most western places). They may call them wifes but legally they are not - is this the case? As long as they are not breaking the law, or hurting anyone, isn't a cas of live and let live, despite our opinion?Report Abuse
LiveLady
Posted Thu Feb 4, 2010 at 9:41 am Reply Delete
The Texas case involved claims of pedophilia. When it couldn't be proved the children were returned is my recollection. IMO, the child abuse goes beyond that and the State should be looking into it far more closely than it does.Report Abuse

Advanced Search Search

Graffiti to Go

A space for you to share your recommendations of sites, services and special things with other readers.