X
Advanced Search
Search

Shout It

Superbowl Super Controversy

Superbowl Super Controversy

Does Pro-life footballer demean women?

by US Staff (Thu Jan 28, 2010)
You May Also Like

Tim Tebow is a hunky college football player who, I am told, may be a professional football player next year. Mr. Tebow, along with his mom, is starring in one of the very, very expensive commercial spots during this year's Superbowl. For those of you outside the U.S., the Superbowl is the American football championship game and the most viewed sporting event of the year. Thirty second commercial spots cost millions of dollars each.

So, why am I telling you all this? Well, Mr. Tebow is starring in an anti-abortion advert paid for by a Christian organization called Focus on Family (Tebow is very Christian). It is reported that in the spot, which is very secretive till it airs, it is explained by either Mr. Tebow or his mother, that she was advised to have an abortion when she was pregnant with her son for health reasons. She refused, went ahead with the pregnancy and the result was her son Tim, one of the most prolific players in college football history.

The National Organization for Women has been leading a protest movement to convince CBS, the network that carries the Superbowl and thus the ad, not to run the Tebow ‘right to life' ad. Their rationale is that it is ‘offensive and extraordinarily demeaning' to women.

Regardless of your position on abortion, it would seem to me that NOW has a few problems. First, the other ads aired during the Superbowl are far more demeaning, like ‘drink Budweiser and all women become promiscuous little sluts.' Second, there is the whole free speech thing to contend with. And, third, if they have a different point of view, they should go to their constituents, raise some money and put on an ad that advocates their point of view.

Classic View
|
Expand All
Show:
Oldest First
|
Newest First
|
Most Popular First
Cancel

Please login before commenting and you'll be able to manage your comments.

Preview Submit
Posted Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 4:51 pm Reply Delete
Just a quote from Focus on the Family - "Focus on the Family opposes abortion under all circumstances, except in the rare instance when the mother's life is threatened by continuing the pregnancy." And continues "In the beginning, God created the earth and everything in it, including humans. As it says in Psalm 139:13, "For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb." We believe that every human, in every condition from the single cell stage of development to natural death, is made in God's image and possesses inestimable worth. Abortion runs contrary to these beliefs. " This organization, through its ads, has the aim of turning back the clock on abortion rights. In fact, if you go to the web site, you'll find, under "Talking Points" this - "•We desire to end the practice of abortion: making it both illegal and unthinkable." They have every right to run this ad, but let's not be naive about what this group wants to achieve with it.Report Abuse
2 replies, Last reply by Toni on Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 6:34 pm
LiveLady
Posted Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 5:47 pm Reply Delete
@Toni : I am not sure if you are saying that I am being naive but I will assume that you are (putting Felix Unger's cautions about doing that aside) and say that I am well aware of Focus on Family's position on abortion and the religious dogma behind it. Politicians who are guided by God scare the hell out of me. But, as you said, FoF has every right to run the ad and influence the legislative and judicial process. You cannot be for that when the message appeals to you and against it when it does not.Report Abuse
Posted Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 6:34 pm Reply Delete
@Noname: No sorry, I was thinking of the bigger audience of the ad when it runs. No matter how "persuasive" the ad ends up being, their aims and their message are very uncompromising and extreme. I haven't said that I am against any ad running, regardless of my position on it. I care very deeply about freedom of speech - I just can't stand it when organizations couch their messages. Even on the web site, you have to go through quite a few pages to find their position statements.Report Abuse
Posted Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 4:24 pm Reply Delete
Ooh, forming an opinion without even seeing the original. But I guess if you post in "Shout It" you are going to expect controversy. My own opinion (obviously deeply thought out in two minutes flat) is that we all filter things through our own templates and put a meaning on them that may well differ from others' meanings and interpretations, but that if we can remember that, things can be kept in proportion and discussed. Abortion will always have loads of pro and anti voices, but as LiveLady says, much better to simply respect each one as someone else's opinion not condemn. Anyway, we can't answer the header question till we've seen the ad - and in the UK I may never do so...Report Abuse
2 replies, Last reply by Eleanor Patrick on Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 5:57 pm
LiveLady
Posted Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 5:48 pm Reply Delete
@Eleanor Patrick: Eleanor, it will be all over YouTube 2 seconds after it airs (maybe even before it airs).Report Abuse
Posted Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 5:57 pm Reply Delete
@Noname: Oh yes, silly me!Report Abuse
Posted Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 1:41 pm Reply Delete
Yes but women have a choice whether to drink beer and become promiscuous little sluts. What this ad would attempt to do is strip them of their LEGAL right to an abortion. I don't think it particularly demeaning to women although whoever said that if men had to have babies, abortion would be a sacrament was dead right.Report Abuse
2 replies, Last reply by LiveLady on Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 2:15 pm
Rootietoot
Posted Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 2:11 pm Reply Delete
@Toni : If you have not seen the ad, then how do you know it's trying to strip women of their right to a legal abortion, rather than trying to convince them not to have one on moral grounds? If a person has the money to pay for an ad, however it might offend a certain demographic, then they have the right to show the ad. Offended people have a right to a rebutal.Report Abuse
LiveLady
Posted Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 2:15 pm Reply Delete
@Toni : Toni, I couldn't agree with you more on the sacrament bit. Very funny and very true. But, what you said earlier in your comment is meant to incite - I think. The ad is not trying to "strip" anyone of any "legal" right. How can an ad do that? It is trying to convince people (so they can convince their congressman or the Supreme Court to make it illegal) that abortion is wrong - murder even. I firmly believe that we have a right to choose what to do with our own bodies and anything growing within them but I respect that the other side of the issue feels very strongly about their own beliefs. I also understand what is at stake and I believe that pro-choice is a powerful enough voice in this country, without resorting to rhetoric, that Roe v. Wade is never going away. I just believe that the entire dialogue could be made better for everyone if we could empathize with the right to lifers and they with us but I am certain that will never happen.Report Abuse

Advanced Search Search

Graffiti to Go

A space for you to share your recommendations of sites, services and special things with other readers.