X
Advanced Search
Search

Byte It

Automatic for the People

Automatic for the People

Auto-Tune audio technology

by Mya Greene (Wed Feb 03, 2010)
You May Also Like

A staggering number of people, when questioned which skill they would really like to master, put 'singing' at the top of their list.

What is your singing voice like? Is it a soothing arrangement of glittering, golden harmonics or a glass-shattering, atonal screech? Does it make you despair that you would never, in your wildest dreams, become a professional singer?

Well, today, with the help of a computer and a few gadgets, legendary pop status can be cultivated from your spare bedroom. Even if you sound like a tone-deaf hyena, there is now a plug-in to neutralise the ear-toxins contained in your singing voice.

It's called Auto-Tune.

Sound unfamiliar? Well, perhaps you're not au fait with the name of the software, but you will certainly have listened to some of the work it has touched. In fact, currently you would be struggling to turn the radio on without hearing a track that does not utilise this recording technology to some extent - be it a subtle boost to the voice or an unashamed, in-yer-face robot chant. Next time you switch on, take a moment to listen to the sounds of the singers. It won't take long for you to detect a certain uniformity of tone. Imagine what R2D2's singing voice might sound like...

Auto-Tune was developed as a recording tool, to correct minor imperfections in vocal performance. It wasn't intended as a magic cure-all for people who can't actually sing.

American rapper Jay-Z raised the profile of Auto-Tune last summer with his song 'D.O.A. Death of Auto-Tune,' where he criticised its over-use in contemporary music. It has actually been around quite a while.

Remember Cher's 1998 song 'Believe'? This was the first mass selling disc to apply Auto-Tune to the vocal. To be fair, in this instance it was used more as a sound-effect than a 'fix' - but it's a good illustration of the 'robotic' timbre Auto-Tune can lend to a voice.

So what does it do?

It does what it says on the tin. It automatically tunes your voice. It has been described as Photoshop for the voice - airbrushing away pitching imperfections.

And how does it work?

In simple terms, it very cleverly identifies which note you are trying to sing (which note you are closest to) and plays a sine wave (a sort of ooohhhh sound) of the desired note (that eluded you). The less accomplished a singer you are, the greater the need for Auto-Tune.

I was fortunate enough to earn my living in the pop-music industry during my twenties and early thirties. Firmly situated on the creative side, I was never more comfortable than when the door of the vocal booth slid shut and I was in my perfect little musical cocoon.

Ah, happy days!

Since I was 'active,' the musical topography has altered, and digital technology has largely replaced the old analogue sound. I never had the option of airbrushing away my vocal imperfections with Auto-Tune. I just had to keep going until I nailed the take. Auto-Tune would have saved us a lot of time in those days.

The thinking now is that 'anyone can do it.' The musical chaff can sing along with the wheat in total accord. Depending on which soap-box you stand, the technology has either democratised, energised, homogenised, neutralised or vandalised. It's certainly polarised opinion.

I am of the probably deeply unfashionable view that I would rather listen to the real thing. To use a deeply unfashionable analogy, I liken it to watching a golfer take a putt, knowing there's a magnet in the ball and a magnet in the cup. Zero talent required.

When you know somebody's going to make the putt, or hit the note, all excitement is removed. And if everyone can do it, and everyone sounds the same, how can you tell if anyone is really any good anymore? And what's so good about everyone sounding the same? Who wants to eat chocolate all day every day? Sometimes you fancy a cream cake instead.

So, enlisting the help of a computer-savvy teen who knows their way around home recording techniques could open up a global audience for shower-singers everywhere. You can download a free trial of Auto-Tune online and if you really get the bug, you can buy the full version of the software for a perfectly pitched four hundred dollars. Use the Internet to help fulfill your singing fantasies. YouTube is awash with master-classes in recording techniques. This time next week you could be a MySpace sensation!

The jury is out on whether or not this is a good thing...but if mastering singing sits at the top of your skills-set wish list, there's never been an easier time to do it.

Great Graffiti 7 people liked this
Add a Comment 4 Comments
Threaded View
|
Expand All
Show:
Oldest First
|
Newest First
|
Most Popular First
Cancel

Please login before commenting and you'll be able to manage your comments.

Preview Submit
Posted Tue Feb 9, 2010 at 11:31 am Reply Delete
My friend's tutor at college used to work on the Spice Girls tour and they used it on nearly every song (that was a little sad as I was a fan of the Spice Girls while growing up). You can tell the people who use it because when it comes to singing live (I mean actual live rather than miming) they have to tune down or change the melody. For example Take That recorded Shine in Eb then when singing live perform it in D (so that makes it overall slightly lower.Report Abuse
Lisa H.
Posted Thu Feb 4, 2010 at 2:49 pm Reply Delete
I knew about some of this stuff...with what they do to voices. You can tell by how the person sings in concert. And some of them...they can't sing...no way, no how and aren't a real artist unless they have some autotuning!Report Abuse
Mel
Posted Wed Feb 3, 2010 at 5:29 pm Reply Delete
oooo, interesting. Now I do love photoshop (you didn't think those pix on my blog were completely au naturel did you? We all need a little brightening up...), but I think it only works up to a point. If you've taken a fairly crap shot, you can do a little magic in photoshop,but you'll never make your shot look incredible (but you might make it look very fake). Doesn't the same apply with this technology? Victoria Beckham is never going to sound like Joss Stone. And of course I am AGOG and want DETAILS about your creative spell as a crooning, topless lapdancer. Have I let my imagination run away with me there?Report Abuse
Posted Wed Feb 3, 2010 at 2:08 pm Reply Delete
In the early 8os there was a thing called the Vocoder which I guess was a front runner. Even I could make a sound on that that didn't make people's ears bleed. Think I'll pass on this one though.Report Abuse

Advanced Search Search

Graffiti to Go

A space for you to share your recommendations of sites, services and special things with other readers.

Video Graffiti

Facebook in Real Life View all videos